Navigating the Uncertainty: Alabama Court Strikes Down Corporate Transparency Act as Unconstitutional

In an unexpected twist for businesses nationwide, the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA"), aimed at enhancing financial transparency and curbing illicit activities, has been deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by National Small Business United and an Alabama small business owner, challenging the CTA's encroachment on Congress's regulatory reach.

 

Background on the Corporate Transparency Act

 

Introduced in 2021, the CTA sought to clamp down on financial crimes such as money laundering by requiring entities to disclose beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau within the United States Department of the Treasury. The legislation targeted entities both newly formed and existing, mandating disclosures that, if neglected or falsely reported, could lead to significant penalties.

 

The Alabama Court's Ruling

 

The case, National Small Business United v. Yellen, concluded with the court siding with the plaintiffs, asserting that the CTA's mandates exceeded the legislative powers granted to Congress under the Constitution. Specifically, the court found the CTA's provisions could not be justified under the Commerce, Taxing, and Necessary and Proper Clauses, leading to a temporary injunction preventing FinCEN from enforcing the Act against the plaintiffs.

 

Implications for Compliance

 

While the Treasury Department is likely to appeal the decision, seeking to pause the injunction during the process, the ruling casts doubt on the immediate future of the CTA's enforcement. This development poses a significant question for businesses in the process of preparing for compliance: Should efforts continue in anticipation of the CTA's reinstatement upon appeal?

 

Critics of the CTA have long argued that the Act places an unfair burden on small businesses, requiring them to navigate and comply with complex reporting requirements for seemingly minor or routine changes. The court's injunction currently benefits only the plaintiffs, leaving other businesses in a limbo of compliance uncertainty.

 

FinCEN's Position and Broader Impacts

 

Following the ruling, FinCEN issued a notice confirming its non-enforcement stance against the plaintiffs, narrowly defining this group as the individuals and entities directly involved in the case. However, the decision opens the door to potential defenses for other businesses against the CTA's filing requirements, especially as similar challenges against the Act emerge nationwide.

 

Future Outlook

 

Given the likelihood of an appeal and the potential for a protracted legal battle, the prevailing advice for businesses is to proceed with caution. The ruling, while currently limited in scope, may ultimately influence broader enforcement of the CTA, urging companies to stay informed and prepared for any eventual compliance requirements.

 

As the legal landscape around the CTA continues to evolve, businesses and legal practitioners alike will need to monitor developments closely. The implications of this case and others like it could significantly affect the regulatory framework for financial transparency in the United States.

 

For more detailed advice on navigating these changes and ensuring compliance, businesses should consult with legal experts familiar with the evolving situation.

 

We will keep tracking this story, offering insights and guidance as new information emerges. Stay tuned for updates on this critical issue affecting businesses across the country.

CTA Challenges for Foreign Nationals

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) took effect January 1, 2024, requiring non-exempt reporting companies to report personal identifiable information (PII) for each beneficial owner of the company. For each beneficial owner, the company must report the individual’s full legal name, date of birth, residential address, and a unique identifying number (which may be a US driver’s license, US passport, or foreign passport). This documentation requirement will prove challenging for many foreign nationals who are beneficial owners of reporting companies.

Who are Foreign Nationals?

According to the PEW research center, in 2018 there were at least 44.8 million individuals living in the United States who were born outside of the country. That same study concluded that, while most foreign nationals were legally authorized to reside in the United States and are here legally, roughly 23% are not.

Of these 10 million individuals, some are individuals who do not possess a valid visa or other immigration documentation. Others entered the U.S. without inspection, stayed longer than their temporary visa permitted, or otherwise violated the terms under which they were admitted to the U.S.

Despite their undocumented or illegal status, however, many undocumented foreign nationals find ways to work and even form and operate their own businesses. Every state in the U.S. allows an individual to form a corporation or LLC without regard to their immigration status. According to the American Immigration Council, by 2020 there were at least 800,000 undocumented business owners in the US. Many of the businesses owned by these undocumented entrepreneurs are likely to be non-exempt reporting companies under the CTA. In addition, there are likely many other non-exempt reporting companies that have undocumented residents as investors who may also beneficial owners of those companies.

The documentation requirements for beneficial owners in the CTA will pose unique challenges for undocumented foreign nationals.

The CTA Documentation Requirement for Beneficial Owners

The CTA requires each non-exempt reporting company to file a beneficial ownership information (BOI) report that identifies the full legal name of each beneficial owner and, for each of them, provide a unique identifying number from an acceptable identifying document (together with an image file of that document).

The CTA permits reporting companies to provide the following types of acceptable identifying documents:

1. A non-expired passport issued by the U.S.

2. A non-expired identification document issued by a State, local government, or Indian Tribe.

3. A non-expired driver’s license issued by a State.

4. A non-expired passport issued by a foreign government (if individual does not have one of the other three forms of identification listed above).

Many foreign nationals living in the United States will not have any of these types of documents.

An undocumented foreign national will not have a U.S. passport since the foreign national, by definition, is not a U.S. citizen.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, only 19 states have adopted legislation to allow undocumented immigrants to obtain a state-issued driver’s license. At least 34 states refuse to issue identification documents or driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants.

Lacking a U.S. passport or state-issued driver’s license means that an undocumented immigrant must rely on a foreign passport in order to have acceptable identification for CTA purposes.

Many undocumented immigrants, however, do not have a non-expired foreign passport. In some situations, the individual may have lost their foreign passport, or have had it stolen or confiscated. Because of their undocumented status, an undocumented immigrant may not return to their country of origin to resolve the problem of a lost or missing foreign passport. In other situations, a foreign passport may have expired or become non-renewable while the immigrant was in the U.S., putting the undocumented immigrant in an inescapable legal limbo.

While it may sometimes be possible for a foreign national to obtain a passport from a foreign country through the foreign country’s embassy or consulate in the United States, most embassies and consulates are located in large U.S. cities, which can pose a problem for undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. In addition, the procedure for obtaining a passport from these foreign embassies can sometimes be lengthy and costly.

Additionally, Foreign Nationals living outside of the United States may be unable to obtain a passport. The U.S. government, for example, will not issue a passport to an individual accused or convicted of a crime. Similarly, in Canada, the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship must refuse to issue, or suspend a passport to an individual who is in persistent arrears under a support order.

FinCEN Considered, but Rejected, Alternative Approaches During Rule-Making

In its September 2022 release of the Reporting Rule, FinCEN described comments it had received that “pointed out a number of situations in which a beneficial owner or company applicant may not have an acceptable identification number.”

FinCEN specifically rejected the suggestion that it expand the list of acceptable documents, however, reasoning that the statute itself only permitted the four acceptable document types in 31 U.S.C. 5336(a)(1).

In essence, FinCEN reasoned that it lacked the statutory authorization to expand the list of acceptable document types.

Solutions for the CTA Documentation Problems of Undocumented Immigrants

There are few solutions available for undocumented immigrants who lack one of the acceptable types of identification permitted under the CTA.

To the extent an undocumented immigrant is aware of the problem, it would be prudent for that individual to begin whatever procedure is necessary to obtain acceptable documentation. In many situations this will involve the process of obtaining a new or renewed passport from the U.S. embassy or consulate of the individual’s country of origin.

In some situations, however, owing to the expensive or time-consuming of these foreign governments, even a diligent effort might not be sufficient to produce the required passport in time for an individual to file a BOI report before the applicable deadline.

On solution that FinCEN could adopt, through an amendment to its Reporting Rule, would be to permit foreign nationals to submit the Form I-551 – Permanent Resident Card (i.e., a “green card”) or Form I-765

Employment Authorization Document (EAD). Each of these documents is recognized by the U.S. government in other contexts as sufficient to identify an individual for employment and other purposes. Applications for a green card or EAD are thorough and require the applicant to submit biographical information. Both the EAI and the green card contain a photograph, just like a passport or driver's license. To the extent, however, that FinCEN believes it lacks the statutory authority to expand the list of acceptable documentation types, this approach would require Congressional action to amend the CTA.

While FinCEN could permit beneficial owners to submit green cards or EADs, even this would not solve the problem for all undocumented immigrants, since many will not be able to obtain green cards or EADs, leaving some portion of the problem unresolved.

Another practical step some reporting companies could take would be to restructure their corporate governance to eliminate situations where an undocumented immigrant falls within the definition of beneficial owner by means of their substantial control. Reporting companies formed before 2024 have until the end of the year to file their initial BOI reports, so there is time remaining in some circumstances to reorganize corporate governance to avoid a situation where the reporting company is unable to complete its BOI report.

Conclusion

The problem of illegal immigration is persistent and controversial. While that debate is important, however, consigning a statistically significant category of undocumented immigrants to CTA noncompliance does not help to resolve the problem of illegal immigration. Their compliance problem will also become a compliance problem for those reporting companies who have undocumented immigrants as beneficial owners. At present, a reporting company is unable to file an incomplete or partial BOI report. Thus, a reporting company with even one undocumented immigrant as a beneficial owner will be unable to file, putting the risk of legal non-compliance on the entire company and its responsible senior officers. FinCEN’s statutory mandate to create a database that is “highly useful to national security, intelligence, and law enforcement agencies and Federal functional regulators” would seem to obligate FinCEN to find a solution for the documentation problems posed to foreign nationals.

Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act: A Guide to Reporting Beneficial Ownership Information

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) has marked the beginning of a new era of accountability and transparency for small businesses in the United States. With the aim of combating illicit financial activities, the CTA, effective from January 1, 2024, requires certain businesses to submit Beneficial Ownership Information Reports (BOIR). In this guide, we break down everything small business owners need to know to comply with this crucial requirement, providing detailed information to simplify the process.

Understanding the Reporting of Beneficial Ownership Information:

The CTA was enacted to increase transparency in business ownership and prevent the misuse of anonymous corporations for activities such as tax evasion and money laundering. Businesses that fall into the definition of a reporting company must submit a BOIR to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). A beneficial owner is a person who owns or controls at least 25% of an organization or exercises substantial control in specified roles within the company. This reporting requirement aims to create a more transparent business landscape by identifying those with significant ownership interests.

Filing Requirements for Small Businesses:

Small businesses that qualify as reporting companies must provide detailed information in their corporate transparency reports. This includes the full legal name of the business, business address, state or tribal jurisdiction of formation, taxpayer identification number, and identity documents such as the Articles of Incorporation or Organization filed. Additionally, details of the beneficial owners, such as the full legal name, date of birth, residential address, and a copy of their U.S. driver's license or passport, must be included, ensuring a comprehensive view of the company's ownership structure.

Steps to Submit Your Corporate Transparency Report:

Determine Eligibility:

Check if your business is required to submit a BOIR. Generally, LLCs and corporations are required unless they qualify for specific exemptions, such as large operating companies or entities inactive established before January 1, 2020.

Identify Beneficial Owners:

List individuals who own or control 25% of your company or have substantial control. Learn about the filing requirements and guide them through the process of providing the necessary information to FinCEN, fostering cooperation and understanding among stakeholders.

Create a Procedure:

Establish a secure and organized process to manage the personal information of beneficial owners. Ensure the information is kept up-to-date and be prepared to submit updated reports in case of changes. Implementing a robust procedure will streamline the filing process and minimize the risk of errors.

Submit Your Report Online:

All required reports must be submitted online through FinCEN. You can complete and upload a PDF or use FinCEN's online platform. Businesses established before January 1, 2024, have until January 1, 2025, to submit their initial reports. Familiarize yourself with the online submission process, ensuring accuracy and compliance.

Conclusion:

Navigating the requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act may seem daunting, but with careful preparation and adherence to the outlined steps, small businesses can efficiently meet their obligations. Stay informed, consult legal professionals when necessary, and embrace the transparency that the CTA seeks to introduce into the business landscape. By doing so, companies contribute to a financial environment based on trust and accountability, strengthening the integrity of the corporate sector.

USCIS Announces Strengthened Integrity Measures for H-1B Program

Release Date

01/30/2024

Announces FY 2025 H-1B Cap Initial Registration Period and Online Filing of H-1B Petitions

WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced a final rule to strengthen the integrity of and reduce the potential for fraud in the H-1B registration process, including by reducing the potential for gaming the registration system and ensuring each beneficiary would have the same chance of being selected, regardless of the number of registrations submitted on their behalf. USCIS is also announcing the initial registration period dates for the fiscal year (FY) 2025 H-1B cap, and the launch of an online filing option for Forms I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, and Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, for H-1B petitioners.

“We’re always looking for ways to bolster integrity and curtail the potential for fraud while improving and streamlining our application processes,” said USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou. “The improvements in these areas should make H-1B selections more equitable for petitioners and beneficiaries and will allow for the H-1B process to be fully electronic from registration, if applicable, until final decision and transmission of approved petitions to the Department of State.”

H-1B Registration Final Rule

This final rule contains provisions that will create a beneficiary-centric selection process for registrations by employers, codify start date flexibility for certain petitions subject to the congressionally mandated H-1B cap, and add more integrity measures related to the registration process.

Under the beneficiary centric process, registrations will be selected by unique beneficiary rather than by registration. This new process is designed to reduce the potential for fraud and ensure each beneficiary would have the same chance of being selected, regardless of the number of registrations submitted on their behalf by an employer. Starting with the FY 2025 initial registration period, USCIS will require registrants to provide valid passport information or valid travel document information for each beneficiary. The passport or travel document provided must be the one the beneficiary, if or when abroad, intends to use to enter the United States if issued an H-1B visa. Each beneficiary must only be registered under one passport or travel document.

USCIS is also clarifying requirements regarding the requested employment start date on certain petitions subject to the congressionally mandated H-1B cap to permit filing with requested start dates that are after Oct. 1 of the relevant fiscal year, consistent with current policy.

Additionally, the H-1B final rule codifies USCIS’ ability to deny or revoke H-1B petitions where the underlying registration contained a false attestation or was otherwise invalid. Also under the new rule, USCIS may deny or revoke the approval of an H-1B petition if it determines that the fee associated with the registration is declined, not reconciled, disputed, or otherwise invalid after submission.

USCIS has also announced the Fee Schedule final rule. That rule will go into effect after the initial registration period for the FY 2025 H-1B cap. Therefore, the registration fee during the registration period starting in March 2024, will remain $10.

A new edition of Form I-129 with the H-1B Registration final rule and Fee Schedule final rule changes will soon be available to preview on uscis.gov (edition date 04/01/24). On April 1, 2024, only the 04/01/24 edition of Form I-129 will be accepted.

The H-1B Registration final rule makes final some provisions proposed in the Oct. 23, 2023, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Note that DHS intends to publish a separate final rule to address the remaining provisions contained in the NPRM.

FY 2025 H-1B Cap Initial Registration Period

The initial registration period for the FY 2025 H-1B cap will open at noon Eastern on March 6, 2024, and run through noon Eastern on March 22, 2024. During this period, prospective petitioners and their representatives, if applicable, must use a USCIS online account to register each beneficiary electronically for the selection process and pay the associated registration fee for each beneficiary.   

For more information on the H-1B Cap Season, visit H-1B Cap Season webpage.

Organizational Accounts and Online Filing for Forms I-129 and I-907

On Feb. 28, 2024, USCIS will launch the previously announced new organizational accounts in the USCIS online account that will allow multiple people within an organization and their legal representatives to collaborate on and prepare H-1B registrations, H-1B petitions, and any associated Form I-907. 

Also on Feb. 28, USCIS will launch online filing of Form I-129 and associated Form I-907 for non-cap H-1B petitions. On April 1, USCIS will begin accepting online filing for H-1B cap petitions and associated Forms I-907 for petitioners whose registrations have been selected.

Petitioners will continue to have the option of filing a paper Form I-129 H-1B petition and any associated Form I-907 if they prefer. However, during the initial launch of organizational accounts, users will not be able to link paper-filed Forms I-129 and I-907 to their online accounts.

As a reminder, USCIS recently announced a final rule that will increase the filing fee for Form I-907, to adjust for inflation, effective Feb. 26, 2024. If USCIS receives a Form I-907 postmarked on or after Feb. 26, 2024, with the incorrect filing fee, we will reject the Form I-907 and return the filing fee. For filings sent by commercial courier (such as UPS, FedEx, and DHL), the postmark date is the date reflected on the courier receipt.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow USCIS on TwitterInstagramYouTubeFacebook and LinkedIn.

Cap Reached for Additional Returning Worker H-2B Visas for the First Half of FY 2024

Cap Reached for Additional Returning Worker H-2B Visas for the First Half of FY 2024

Release Date

01/12/2024

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has received enough petitions to reach the cap for the additional 20,716 H-2B visas made available for returning workers for the first half of fiscal year 2024 with start dates on or before March 31, 2024, under the H-2B supplemental cap temporary final rule (FY 2024 TFR). Jan.9, 2024, was the final receipt date for petitions requesting supplemental H-2B visas under the FY 2024 first half returning worker allocation.

We are still accepting petitions for H-2B nonimmigrant workers with start dates on or before March 31, 2024, for the additional 20,000 visas allotted for nationals of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Haiti, Colombia, Ecuador, and Costa Rica (country-specific allocation), as well as those who are exempt from the congressionally mandated cap.

The FY 2024 TFR was published on Nov. 17, 2023, with an immediate effective date. USCIS immediately began accepting H-2B petitions with start dates on or before March 31, 2024, for the 20,716 returning worker allocation for the first half of FY2024, and the 20,000 allocation for nationals of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Haiti, Colombia, Ecuador, and Costa Rica who are exempt from the returning worker requirement.

Petitioners with start dates on or before March 31, 2024, whose workers were not accepted for the 20,716 returning worker allocation are encouraged to file under the country-specific allocation while visas remain available. As of Jan. 12, 2024, USCIS has received petitions requesting 4,500 workers under the 20,000 visas set aside for nationals of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Haiti, Colombia, Ecuador, and Costa Rica.

Additional information on the FY 2024 supplemental visas is available on the Temporary Increase in H-2B Nonimmigrant Visas for FY 2024 page.